Not long ago, has appeared a new blog "Media Monitoring" , which according to the author seeks to undo the manipulation media play in favor of the "leftist" (I repeat: the author explains). If one looks at him for a while, you'll discover, for many details, which defends the ideas of the Republican Party of the United States. One of his obsessions (said with all due respect) is proclaimed, test, advertise ... that the "climate change" is a fallacy. Despite
opinions as to highlight the difference between his and my blog, the arrival of someone new to review (maybe not so new) is always welcome, and facilitates discussion. That's why I include your blog in my recomentats, I usually do that, I recommend the blogs that often do not agree, and I put them in the list is updated, because I find interesting, not There is nothing worse for feeding the intellect to avoid topics or ideas just because they are not ours.
to write this post I take it a response to that call Mr X, probably because the fact of having been too long, I do not accept it as a comment your post:
http://www.blogger.com/goog_104379541
Reason for I put the answer here:
is to thank, in addition to criticism the idea of \u200b\u200b"climate change" of human origin, contributions links (apart from the greater or lesser quality of the work of their authors) are interesting and should be taken into account.
However the work of Robinson-Robinson -Soon (the second link you provide us) have received much criticism from the scientific community due to errors in the application method:
As you write often, if not want to be manipulators, not we ignore these corrections.
In fact, I have noticed that the graphs show that only refer to the Earth's atmosphere, where despite the increase of CO2 in the last century, the percentage moves even within similar values \u200b\u200bover the millennia (Over the last 150,000 years, the variation was small compared with the variation of solar activity ), why can only perceive the effects of solar activity, but the pace that we, the atmosphere will have the usual percentage of CO2 derived from these graphs. Because the findings of this study were more general graphs should be studied different atmospheres such as Mars and Venus.
The third link led me a smile. It is true that CO2 makes plants grow. I remember an experiment we did in one of the schools I was very surprised and students. However, those who criticize (criticize) the uncontrolled dumping of CO2 into the atmosphere than they do not refuse to grow plants. The water is not toxic, but some people occasionally die drowned in rivers and seas to the pools. And indeed, strictly speaking, CO2 is toxic and if you put in a hermetically closed chamber, with a limited amount of air, after a time (smaller the smaller the space you're) die lack of O2, as the CO2 will kill you fill the chamber. In this case CO2 that would have generated yourself, it would be extremely polluting.
modestíssima My personal opinion is that either they had not shown any change and convincing enough to prove that we are in a process of climate change of human origin, it is tested the role of CO2 in the greenhouse (effect necessary for life and thanks to which the temperature of the Earth is from -20 ° C) so the CO2 warming, and much, and have luck.
Famous its role is not too difficult to accept as obvious that a disproportionate increase of this gas the atmosphere (an increase as we are experiencing) alter its effect in one direction difficult to predict at 100%, but that certainly affect the climate and life, because the climate depends provadament the greenhouse effect (if not the case would be -20 º C) and life depends on the weather. Whether or not we have already entered the "change" if CO2 levels continue pouring today, this change will occur, and no one can make it reversible.
We then put some of the scientific bodies that have produced models whose predictions have been fulfilled applied to Mars, Venus, carried out there before taking our ships and to verify the reality of climate. As explained so great Carl Sagan in his work "Billions and billions" of physics made use of all these research groups correctly predicts the temperature present in the earth and the greenhouse effect of Venus and Mars, and these same models predict increases of between 1 and 4 ° C throughout the century, the planet Earth
of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Princeton Goddart Institute of NASA Space Studies in New York, The National Center for Research Atmospheric in Boulder (Colorado), the Department of Energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, The University of Oregon, the Hadley Centre for Climate Research and preddicció in Britain, the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg .
A pleasure, Mr. X.
0 comments:
Post a Comment